Life Cycle Assessment
Funds:
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 2053620:
Leading Engineering for America's Prosperity, Health, and Infrastructure (LEAP HI): Optimal Design and Life-Long Adaptation of Civil Infrastructure in a Changing and Uncertain Environment for a Sustainable Future
Coastal regions are increasingly vulnerable to the effects of climate change, particularly due to rising sea levels and the frequency of floods, which are among the most costly natural disasters worldwide. These challenges pose significant risks to coastal communities, affecting their economy, infrastructure, and ecosystems. Traditional flood prevention methods, such as seawalls and levees, have proven to be resource-intensive and can negatively impact the environment. As a response, there is a growing interest in nature-based solutions that leverage natural features—like oyster reefs and wetlands—to enhance resilience against flooding while providing ecological benefits.
Our research aims to address the critical gap in understanding the environmental impacts of different coastal flood protection strategies. The life cycle environmental impacts of grey infrastructure versus greener alternatives remain largely unexplored. We propose a framework for assessing the sustainability of flood protection strategies from a life cycle perspective, enabling a more informed decision-making process. By examining the environmental effects of both conventional and hybrid flood defense systems, we seek to highlight the potential benefits of incorporating natural solutions into coastal management.
Through our comparative life cycle assessment (LCA), we analyze three coastal flood mitigation strategies: traditional grey infrastructure (a levee), a hybrid system combining a levee with an oyster reef, and a baseline scenario with no flood infrastructure. Using a case study from New Orleans, Louisiana, we evaluate the environmental impacts of these strategies across ten impact categories. Presented herein are the results detailing the environmental impacts of the three strategies across these categories.
The findings of this research enhance the design and planning of eco-efficient flood prevention by identifying the most sustainable infrastructure strategies. The developed framework facilitates informed decision-making, emphasizing the importance of considering environmental impacts alongside the economic and social benefits of infrastructure from a life-cycle perspective. Ultimately, recognizing environmental impacts, particularly greenhouse gas emissions, is essential for shifting the approach to coastal protection from reactive measures to proactive solutions. By accounting for life-cycle impacts in our decisions, we ensure that our infrastructure not only mitigates immediate flooding risks but is also sustainable, avoiding contributions to sea-level rise and increased flooding in the future
Hasan, R., McPhillips, L., Warn, G., & Bilec, M. (2024). Life cycle assessment of green–grey coastal flood protection infrastructure: a case study from New Orleans. Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability, 4(2), 025001.
Bhattacharya, A., Warn, G. P., Papakonstantinou, K. G., Bilec, M. M., McPhillips, L., Forest, C. E., Hasan, R. & Chavda, D. (2023). Optimal Design and Life-Long Adaptation of Civil Infrastructure under Climate Change and Uncertain Demands. In ASCE Inspire 2023 (pp. 70-79).